250, 600, 70, 22. What do these numbers have in common? These are the number of people who have signed various open letters opposing Trump and/or stating their intent to vote for Hillary Clinton. 600 historians, 250 members of the foreign policy establishment, 70 former foreign policy officials in Republican administrations, and 22 authors in National Review, to name several. More open letters are likely to appear in the remaining days before the election.
18,000, 23,000, 10,000, 15,000, 30,000. What do these numbers have in common? These are the size of crowds that have attended Trump rallies, many people waiting in line for hours to get in. These are the folks who want to see and hear Trump.
The mainstream media (MSM) and punditocracy give more attention and attach greater importance to signatories of the letters than they do to the hundreds of thousands of individuals who show up every month at Trump rallies. They cite polls showing Clinton in the lead, both nationally and in key battleground states. But her largest crowds during the campaign, apart from her acceptance speech at the Democrat National Convention, rarely exceed a thousand.
The MSM and pundits speculate that Trump's huge crowds may not show up to vote. But these are the same people who proclaimed that he had no chance to win the Republican nomination for president from Day 1 of his campaign.
Many analysts contend that Trump's primary wins and large crowds represent a rebellion against the status quo politics of the [corrupt] ruling elite. If so, why would any member of the Academic Political Media Industrial Complex (APMIC) think that their names on letters would sway voters to their point of view? Rather, each new letter and list of signatories are likely to strengthen Trump's support among those disenchanted with American politics and who want a change.